演讲稿具有逻辑严密，态度明确，观点鲜明的特点。在充满活力，日益开放的今天，演讲稿在我们的视野里出现的频率越来越高，演讲稿的注意事项有许多，你确定会写吗？以下是人见人爱的小编分享的3分钟英语演讲稿优秀5篇，希望能够给予您一些参考与帮助。
亲爱的老师、同学们：
大家好！
自信是成功的第一秘诀，它不仅是对自己能力的信任，更是对自己所追求目标的坚定信念。有了它，才能驶向胜利的彼岸。当敌人日搜夜捕，陈毅“屡不得脱”时，他满怀自信，高唱“血雨腥风应有涯”，“人间开遍自由花”！陈毅的《梅岭三章》就是撼人心魄的自信之歌、胜利之歌！著名科学家门捷列夫说得好：“只有自信，才能让人在最佳的心理状态下工作，而不致被怀疑吞食你的想象力”。苏格拉底也说：“一个人是否有成就，只要看他是否具有自尊和自信。”总之，自信是指向胜利的导航塔，是前进的不竭动力。
自卑却与自信背道而驰。自卑者往往对别人的优点看得过多、过重，而对自己的长处认识不足，只觉得自己什么都不行，又不想去努力赶上，于是沉重的心理压力使这些人唯唯诺诺，裹足不前。自卑者的心理障碍限制了能力的发展，使他们坐失成功的良机，最终一事无成。而走出自卑阴影，前面必定是艳阳天！无论是《千手观音》还是舞动奇迹中的《追光》，演员们都以强（)者的信念与命运抗争，战胜了自卑，他们震撼的演出博得了观众热烈的掌声，深受人们的喜爱。可见，战胜自卑，培养自信，是我们必然的选择。
自负者与自信者也格格不入。自负与自卑都是极端心理，自负者在取得一些成绩后沾沾自喜，甚至目空一切，妄自尊大。这些人就算是先前取得一些成就，也只是昙花一现。历史上的教训值得我们记取。楚汉相争时，项羽在推翻暴秦的残酷统治的斗争中起了不可低估的作用，但暂时的军事优势使他盲目自负，自封“霸王”，结果被刘邦打败，昔日不可一视的英雄，落得自刎乌江的下场。三国时的曹孟德折戟沉沙，覆军于赤壁，又是一个自负导致失败的教训。由此可见，正确估价自己的长处和成绩，正视自己的短处和不足，划清自信与自负的界限，对一个成功者来说真的很重要。
怎样看待自信、自卑、自负，其中充满辩证法。我们要相信自己，却不自负；要正视不足，却不自卑。选择自信，战胜自卑，远离自负，这是新世纪的要求，是追求完美人格的要求。
所以我们要多鼓励自己：“成绩单不漂亮没关系，只要我努力，就是一名好学生！”“基础不好没关系，只要我每天都有进步，就是一种成功！”“我的生活是充满阳光的，努力的我最美丽！”这样自信的度过每一天，你会越来越体验到：我的人生是非常有价值的，我是最棒的！
谢谢大家！
There is a well-known proverb，“Every horse thinks its own pack heaviest,” which means whether people feel optimistic or not lies in what attitudes they adopt. It is universally acknowledged that life is by no means perfect and a positive attitude makes life brighter. As the case stands, it is our attitude rather than the situation itself that determines how we feel.
On the one hand, a positive mind brings about an active life, because to be in a good mood or a bad mood is at one’ s own choice. On the other hand, looking at the bright side of the situation and remaining cheerful work out quite well when one is confronted with adversity.
In such a rat-race society, everyone is bound to encounter difficulties. In my opinion, we should keep an optimistic attitude to pull through any hardship, as we can say “attitude is everything” .
thank you, mr. chairman.
mr. chairman, i join my colleague mr. rangel in thanking you for giving the junior members of this committee the glorious opportunity of sharing the pain of this inquiry. mr. chairman, you are a strong man, and it has not been easy but we have tried as best we can to give you as much assistance as possible.
earlier today, we heard the beginning of the preamble to the constitution of the united states: "we, the people." it's a very eloquent beginning. but when that document was completed on the seventeenth of september in 1787, i was not included in that "we, the people." i felt somehow for many years that george washington and alexander hamilton just left me out by mistake. but through the process of amendment, interpretation, and court decision, i have finally been included in "we, the people."
today i am an inquisitor. an hyperbole would not be fictional and would not overstate the solemnness that i feel right now. my faith in the constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total. and i am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the constitution.
"who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves?" "the subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men." and that's what we're talking about. in other words, [the jurisdiction comes] from the abuse or violation of some public trust.
it is wrong, i suggest, it is a misreading of the constitution for any member here to assert that for a member to vote for an article of impeachment means that that member must be convinced that the president should be removed from office. the constitution doesn't say that. the powers relating to impeachment are an essential check in the hands of the body of the legislature against and upon the encroachments of the executive. the division between the two branches of the legislature, the house and the senate, assigning to the one the right to accuse and to the other the right to judge, the framers of this constitution were very astute. they did not make the accusers and the judgers -- and the judges the same person.
we know the nature of impeachment. we've been talking about it awhile now. it is chiefly designed for the president and his high ministers to somehow be called into account. it is designed to "bridle" the executive if he engages in excesses. "it is designed as a method of national inquest into the conduct of public men." the framers confided in the congress the power if need be, to remove the president in order to strike a delicate balance between a president swollen with power and grown tyrannical, and preservation of the independence of the executive.
the nature of impeachment: a narrowly channeled exception to the separation-of-powers maxim. the federal convention of 1787 said that. it limited impeachment to high crimes and misdemeanors and discounted and opposed the term "maladministration." "it is to be used only for great misdemeanors," so it was said in the north carolina ratification convention. and in the virginia ratification convention: "we do not trust our liberty to a particular branch. we need one branch to check the other."
"no one need be afraid" -- the north carolina ratification convention -- "no one need be afraid that officers who commit oppression will pass with immunity." "prosecutions of impeachments will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community," said hamilton in the federalist papers, number 65. "we divide into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused." i do not mean political parties in that sense.
the drawing of political lines goes to the motivation behind impeachment; but impeachment must proceed within the confines of the constitutional term "high crime[s] and misdemeanors." of the impeachment process, it was woodrow wilson who said that "nothing short of the grossest offenses against the plain law of the land will suffice to give them speed and effectiveness. indignation so great as to overgrow party interest may secure a conviction; but nothing else can."
common sense would be revolted if we engaged upon this process for petty reasons. congress has a lot to do: appropriations, tax reform, health insurance, campaign finance reform, housing, environmental protection, energy sufficiency, mass transportation. pettiness cannot be allowed to stand in the face of such overwhelming problems. so today we are not being petty. we are trying to be big, because the task we have before us is a big one.
this morning, in a discussion of the evidence, we were told that the evidence which purports to support the allegations of misuse of the cia by the president is thin. we're told that that evidence is insufficient. what that recital of the evidence this morning did not include is what the president did know on june the 23rd, 1972.
the president did know that it was republican money, that it was money from the committee for the re-election of the president, which was found in the possession of one of the burglars arrested on june the 17th. what the president did know on the 23rd of june was the prior activities of e. howard hunt, which included his participation in the break-in of daniel ellsberg's psychiatrist, which included howard hunt's participation in the dita beard itt affair, which included howard hunt's fabrication of cables designed to discredit the kennedy administration.
we were further cautioned today that perhaps these proceedings ought to be delayed because certainly there would be new evidence forthcoming from the president of the united states. there has not even been an obfuscated indication that this committee would receive any additional materials from the president. the committee subpoena is outstanding, and if the president wants to supply that material, the committee sits here. the fact is that on yesterday, the american people waited with great anxiety for eight hours, not knowing whether their president would obey an order of the supreme court of the united states.
at this point, i would like to juxtapose a few of the impeachment criteria with some of the actions the president has engaged in. impeachment criteria: james madison, from the virginia ratification convention. "if the president be connected in any suspicious manner with any person and there be grounds to believe that he will shelter him, he may be impeached."
we have heard time and time again that the evidence reflects the payment to defendants money. the president had knowledge that these funds were being paid and these were funds collected for the 1972 presidential campaign. we know that the president met with mr. henry petersen 27 times to discuss matters related to watergate, and immediately thereafter met with the very persons who were implicated in the information mr. petersen was receiving. the words are: "if the president is connected in any suspicious manner with any person and there be grounds to believe that he will shelter that person, he may be impeached."
justice story: "impeachment" is attended -- "is intended for occasional and extraordinary cases where a superior power acting for the whole people is put into operation to protect their rights and rescue their liberties from violations." we know about the huston plan. we know about the break-in of the psychiatrist's office. we know that there was absolute complete direction on september 3rd when the president indicated that a surreptitious entry had been made in dr. fielding's office, after having met with mr. ehrlichman and mr. young. "protect their rights." "rescue their liberties from violation."
the carolina ratification convention impeachment criteria: those are impeachable "who behave amiss or betray their public trust."4 beginning shortly after the watergate break-in and continuing to the present time, the president has engaged in a series of public statements and actions designed to thwart the lawful investigation by government prosecutors. moreover, the president has made public announcements and assertions bearing on the watergate case, which the evidence will show he knew to be false. these assertions, false assertions, impeachable, those who misbehave. those who "behave amiss or betray the public trust."
james madison again at the constitutional convention: "a president is impeachable if he attempts to subvert the constitution." the constitution charges the president with the task of taking care that the laws be faithfully executed, and yet the president has counseled his aides to commit perjury, willfully disregard the secrecy of grand jury proceedings, conceal surreptitious entry, attempt to compromise a federal judge, while publicly displaying his cooperation with the processes of criminal justice. "a president is impeachable if he attempts to subvert the constitution."
if the impeachment provision in the constitution of the united states will not reach the offenses charged here, then perhaps that 18th-century constitution should be abandoned to a 20th-century paper shredder.
has the president committed offenses, and planned, and directed, and acquiesced in a course of conduct which the constitution will not tolerate? that's the question. we know that. we know the question. we should now forthwith proceed to answer the question. it is reason, and not passion, which must guide our deliberations, guide our debate, and guide our decision.
i yield back the balance of my time, mr. chairman.
我是来自xx级环境艺术一班的，很高兴自己能够获得牵手励志奖学金，时间的脚步匆匆而过，我已经是一名即将毕业的一名学生了，三年来自己学到了好多好多，其中的历程有迷茫、有遗憾、有伤心、也有开心等等，从开始的懵懂无知，到现在也不见得有多么的成熟，至少自己感觉的到自己的成长变化，懂得了很多。对我来说，这次获奖不仅是一项荣誉，更是学校领导对我们的殷切关怀与帮助，也是自己毕业前的一次很大的收获，这激励着我会继续努力的学习，为毕业寻找工作打下夯实的基础，增强就业的机会，以求不断的进步。
当得知自己获得国家励志奖学金时，我不知道该如何陈述自己的内心感受，有感动，有兴奋，也有泪水。高兴的是我终于可以用我自己的努力支付欠下的一部分学费，不辜负校领导，及老师们对我的期望。在这里，首先，我要感谢党和国家对我们大学生的支持和关心，使我的求学道路更加光明；其次，我要感谢学校、辛苦教导的老师和同学们，是他们给了我这个机会；再而，我要感谢我的亲人与朋友，是他们在我的背后默默地支持着我、关爱我；同时，我也很欣慰自己的努力得到了收获，得到了肯定。
我来自一个普通的农民家庭，对于我来说，我的家庭没有给予我厚实的财富，但却给了我改变命运的勇气。父母留给我的那种勤劳、善良、朴实的优良作风深深地影响着我，我一直相信，只有通过努力才有成功的希望、只有知识才能改变命运、只有努力才能拥有美好的未来。获得牵手励志奖学金对我说是一种激励和鼓励；相信通过我的努力，用我的双手一定可以成功。我是一个自信心很强的人，同时我也是很负责任的人。自信心强是因为我有付出自己的辛勤劳动，我坚信：只有耕耘才有收获，成功之门是为敢于拼搏、善于拼搏的人敞开的。责任对于人来说，可以是一种无形的负担，但也可以说是在激励着人的斗志，我更喜欢后者，因为我觉得，在我们的现实生活中，人的惰性是人的天敌，它无时无刻地在侵蚀着我们的思想，让我们懒惰起来，只有身负很强责任心的人，才能很好地克服自身的惰性，让我们随时充满动力，勇往直前！
拿破仑说过胜利属于永远坚持不懈者。雏鸟要飞翔于苍天，需要振翅的勇敢；幼马要奔驰于旷野，需要跌倒又爬起的毅力；也许不是每个人都生来具有这样优秀的品质，但我们可以学习养成这种品质。“百步九折萦岩峦”时，学会养成知难而进、逆水行舟的能力，让逆境挖掘我们的智慧，激发我们的潜能；“吹尽黄沙始到金”时，学会养成不骄不躁、沉着理性的脾气，让成功增加我们的信心。我要把奖学金化作今后不竭的动力，完成新的征程。
进入大学以后，同学们对我的照顾，让我渐渐走出阴霾。是心细的老师与热心的同学，让我重新拾起了对生活的信心与热情。让我深深感受到了集体的温暖，也深深体会到了祖国的温暖，同时也感到身上背负着沉甸甸的责任与叮咛。获得国家励志奖学金对我来说是一种激励和鼓励， 它让我懂得贫寒并不是生活中真正的障碍，重要的是有一颗励志而不屈服的心。这让我更加坚定了自己的信念，我一定要尽自己最大的努力，要比别人做得更好、更出色。我相信只要用心去感知事物、全身心地去做，用自己的智慧与勤奋无论对于学习还是工作都一定会更完美、更出色地完成。在生活中我一直严格要求自己，对待生活，要充满信心，对待同学，要充满爱心，在学习中要充满耐心与热心。身在这个学校里，我一直很感激，感激学校，老师们对我的厚爱，感谢同学们对我的关心，这份奖学金的获得，他们的帮助是不可或缺的，如果不是他们给我的鼓励和帮助，我不可能有这些成绩。在这里，我向学校领导，老师们表示衷心的感谢。
大学三年带给我的成长远远超过前面20xx年给予我的东西，因为这三年对于我来说是个蜕变的过程。大一的时候我非常安静，什么活动都不敢参加，因为那个时候的我觉得自己什么能力都都没有，除了能认真学习什么都不懂了，组织能力不行，也没有好的口才，更严重的是普通话极差，每一次面对老师都不大敢讲话。可是现在不一样了，只要是合法且不违反社会公德的很多事我都敢做了，因为我长大了，我自信了。虽然我不是学生会干部，不是班级优秀干部，但从大一的一名什么都不参加的，到常常积极忙里忙外于各种活动并能获得相应的成绩，有时候我确实有点累，但很开心，是这一段成长的历程让我成熟了，也要求自己养成了好习惯，所以我想告诉大家的是只要我们真的去做，用心的去做，就不怕做不好。
牵手励志奖学金，不仅仅是一种荣誉，它的设立，寄托了党和国家对我们的殷切期望。而从某种意义上说，更是一种责任，它促使我们学会高效学习，给与我们继续前进的动力，更重要的是，它教导我们学会感恩，回报社会。我们作为新一代的大学生，享受着党和国家的关心、照顾，我们更热爱我们的祖国，拥护中国共产党的领导，在提高学习成绩的同时，加强思想道德建设，培养自己的社会实践能力、创新能力，提高我们的综合素质，追求卓越，高瞻远瞩而不鼠目寸光，在追求至真至善至美的境界中展现真正属于人的高尚品质。追求智慧之博大，精神之富有，品质之高尚，用辛勤的汗水焕发生命的光彩，以卓越的智慧折射生命之光的璀璨。用一颗感恩的心不断奋进，同时，我们应清楚地认识到，我们学习的最终目的不是为了拿奖学金，而是为了实现自己的人生价值，回报社会。我们既要有一种不为名利所累的心态，又不能安于平庸而碌碌无为，不思进取。我们要在宁静中勇于进取，在淡泊中不甘于平庸，在追求卓越中力争人生的辉煌！
虽然获得了牵手励志奖学金，但我深知，与其他真正优秀的同学相比，我所取得的成绩实在是微不足道。不管曾取得怎样的荣誉和成绩，只能说明过去，不能代表将来。掌声终究会消逝，奋斗的脚步还要继续。古希腊寓言作家伊索曾说“人不可因名声与荣誉而成为盲目，因为所有得来的东西都是外物。”一切的一切都要以从零开始的精神去开拓，树立更紧迫更高远的目标，而非满足于停滞和安于现状。站在新的起点上，我将会一如既往地不断努力，全面提高自己各方面素质。以饱满的热情，积极的心态以及高度的责任心去对待每一件事。扎实学好专业知识，广泛涉猎，团结同学，乐于助人，虚心向同学学籍，与老师、同学对交流，发挥学生干部的模范带头作用，百尺竿头，更进一步。
人生有涯而恩情无边， 此时此刻充盈在我心中的是无尽的感激。获此殊荣，让我更加坚定自己的信念。作为一名21世纪的大学生应该具有蟾宫折桂的勇气和百折不挠的韧劲。我会以诚实、勤奋和向上的心态勇敢面对生活中的困难。展望明天，我仍然会带着感恩的心踏踏实实一步一个脚印去迎接未来的挑战。是国家，是学校为我创造了如此好的学习环境，为我们这些贫困生伸出了援助之手，让我们有幸可以接受大学教育。我的身上时刻肩负着国家以及社会给我的责任。在以后的日子里，我会努力学习，尽自己的可能帮助能帮助的同学，不会辜负学校及国家对我的期望，我会以实际行动证明我所说的一切，在认真学习的前提下，不断拓展自己的各方面的能力，要求全面提升自己，成为一名品学兼优的合格大学生。同时，我会以不断的实际行动，回报带给我温暖的社会。
我的演讲结束，谢谢大家！
Good morning ladies and gentlemen:
The title of my speech today is “The Doors that Are Open to Us ”.
The other day my aunt paid me a visit. She was overjoyed. “I got the highest mark in the mid-term examination!” she said. Don't be surprised! My aunt is indeed a student; to be exact, a college student at the age of 45.
Last year, she put aside her private business and signed up for a one-year, full-time management course in a college. “This was the wisest decision I have ever made,” she said proudly like a teenage girl. To her, college is always a right place to pick up new ideas, and new ideas always make her feel young.
“Compared with the late 70s,” she says, “now college students have many doors.” My aunt cannot help but recall her first college experience in 1978 when college doors began to be re-opened after the Cultural Revolution. She was assigned to study engineering despite her desire to study Chinese literature, and a few years later, the government sent her to work in a TV factory.
I was shocked when she first told me how she (had) had no choice in her major and job. Look at us today! So many doors are open to us! I believe there have never been such abundant opportunities for self-development as we have today. And my aunt told me that we should reach our goals by grasping all these opportunities.
The first door I see is the opportunity to study different kinds of subjects that interest us. My aunt said she was happy to study management, but she was also happy that she could attend lectures on ancient Chinese poetry and on Shakespearean drama. As for myself, I am an English major, but I may also go to lectures on history. To me, if college education in the past emphasized specialization, now, it emphasizes free and well-rounded development of each individual. So all the fine achievements of human civilization are open to us.