当认真看完一本名著后，大家一定都收获不少，现在就让我们写一篇走心的'读后感吧。你想知道读后感怎么写吗？以下是人见人爱的小编分享的《项链》英文读后感【优秀7篇】，如果对您有一些参考与帮助，请分享给最好的朋友。
The story is mainly about the beautiful Mathilde, but because he was poor, he could not marry a good family. Finally he married a small clerk in the Ministry of education. Mathilde later borrowed a diamond necklace from a friend in order to show his presence in a department dance. However, after the misunderstanding came back, I found the necklace missing. So, in order to redeem the necklace, Mathilde spent ten years of youth and effort, but finally realized that the necklace was actually a fake.
Poor Marty! Just for a diamond necklace, she gave her ten years of youth. Ten years later, she was no longer young and beautiful anymore. In Maupassant's words, she lost the only capital to be a lady. She sacrificed her youth for this diamond necklace. In fact, in other words, she does not have to pity her. Her excessive vanity leads her to taste the bitter fruit of fate. But what is gratifying is that Mathilde came to maturity after all the hardships.
After reading the story, everyone might think that all the evil results were caused by the vain love of Rosse Wahl, so she was not worth the pitiful, even a bit of mockery in the laughter. But, the mind slowly fluttered out a question: what was the power of a delicate and delicate woman who would choose to repay the road? They had no hesitation, and they quietly chose a thorny way of life to walk each day with their lips. Hard labor and life drew back her unrealistic fantasies from the clouds to the solid ground. At this point I could not help but applaud Rosa Wahl.
At this time, in my mind, when Rosse Wahl told his friend ten years later to confess that the necklace was the other one, she had a smile of pride and innocence. Perhaps this was the most beautiful smile in the world. Although Luo Sewall's appearance had not been bought in the year, she had a self at this time. Respecting the noble spirit. In the balance of beauty and personality, she did not hesitate at all, and said decisively, "return!"
After the necklace is lost, the two codes of youthful beauty and dignity are placed on the balance of life, forcing her to make a choice. She decided to give up her youth and choose dignity. The most important moment in life is to learn to give up and give up is also a kind of beauty. So is it very small for her to "destroy" her or to fulfill her? At first, Mathilde was captured by a strong and fearful vanity. Later, she made a surprising decision without hesitation. Finally, when she met her friend who was still young and beautiful, when she learned the truth about the fake necklace, she had a bright and innocent smile on her face. The smile was her confidence and pride.
The novel's thought-provoking part is that we have seen a heart of gold in a dirty, false, worship society, a lotus flower that is not dyed with mud. Unfortunately, Mathilde was unfortunate that she was unfortunate to add trouble to what she couldn't get, and she was a lucky man, the cruel reality made her sober, life was not just the illusion of the fog, but more step by step.
Guy de Maupassant was the child of an unhappy marriage. His mother has been dessccrriibbeedd as neurotic and his father as a man who sought relief from his wife in the arms of other women. Perhaps the collapse of his parents marriage engendered de Maupassants pessimism, reflected particularly in his stories about infidelity and failed relationships. It certainly influenced his own attitude toward women, which, in turn, affected his creation of characters in stories such as "The Necklace."
Events in History at the Time of the short story.
The purpose of women. De Maupassants attitude toward women was ambivalent. He was one of few nineteenth-century authors to recognize and celebrate womens sensuality rather than regard it as a sign of corruption. He was also, however, devastatingly cruel to women, whether in his own life or in his fiction. He recommended that the French Academy commission a treatise on how to "break decently, properly, politely, without noise, scene or violence, with a woman who adores you and with whom you are fed up" （de Maupassant in Steegmuller, p. 178）， He scoffed at monogamy, insisting that he could not understand how two women could not be better than one, three better than two, and ten better than three.
the women is like money and beauty ，because she want other people and friends to admare her,she want to other people think she is a rich women.but her husband isnt rich and just a normel worker in the locel garwenment.there was a dancing party she can take part in,but she didnt has good dress and necklace,so she borrowed a necklace from one of her friends,but she lost it,she and her husband borrowed money and bought another necklace that looks like just the one she borrowed.its very expensive,for repaying the money she and her husband worked very hard for many years.and she looked older than before after these years.but she learned at last that the necklace she borrowed is a fame!
“What would have happened if she hadn’t lost that necklace? How strange and changeful is life! How small a thing is needed to make or ruin us!” This is what impressed me most in “The Necklace” written by Guy de Maupassant.
This story is about a beautiful woman called Mathilde. She borrowed a necklace from her friend to go to a party. At the party，she lose the necklace and buy another one returned her friend. She also worked to buy that necklace for 10 years. 10 years later，her friend tell her the necklace she borrow her is a fake.
I think this story tell us do not be trouble of can not have something.
Guy de Maupassant was the child of an unhappy marriage. His mother has been dessccrriibbeedd as neurotic and his father as a man who sought relief from his wife in the arms of other women. Perhaps the collapse of his parents marriage engendered de Maupassants pessimism， reflected particularly in his stories about infidelity and failed relationships. It certainly influenced his own attitude toward women， which， in turn， affected his creation of characters in stories such as "The Necklace."
De Maupassants attitude toward women was ambivalent. He was one of few nineteenth-century authors to recognize and celebrate womens sensuality rather than regard it as a sign of corruption. He was also， however， devastatingly cruel to women， whether in his own life or in his fiction. He remended that the French Academy mission a treatise on how to "break decently， properly， politely， without noise， scene or violence， with a woman who adores you and with whom you are fed up" （de Maupassant in Steegmuller， p. 178）。 He scoffed at monogamy， insisting that he could not understand how two women could not be better than one， three better than two， and ten better than three.
Life，alwayshave，asnecklacesaid:thestoryofayoungandhappywomaninpursuitofamomentofluxuryandpride，butinexchangefor10yearsofhardlaborcosts，andfinallygetisnottothinkFestivalMadamethecruelanswer，readhere，can'thelpthinking，vanitythen，thisarticlerevealstherealityasworthyofstudy，inthecapitalistsocietytheexistenceofsuchthingsisnotrare，itisoneofthecapitalistclassvanitycorrosioncausedlossofthetragicimageofyouth!Thevanity.Infact，everyonehas，thedifferenceis，somepeopleareverysmall，andsomepeoplearemany，likeshowaroundpeoplepraiseandhavecastenviouseyeswassatisfied，andthenecklacedeeptoexposethefact，vanityisveryterrible，whenapersonhasavanity，hewilldomanysurprisingthings，likeMadameLoisel，for10yearstopayoffthisshouldnothetorepaythedebt，thelifeissostrange，sochangingallthetime，andsomepeoplerichovernight，somepeopleovernightbankruptcy…
The Necklace: Reflections and Confessions of Human’s Vanity
“What would have happened if she hadn’t lost that necklace? Who knows? Who knows? How strange and changeful is life! How small a thing is needed to make or ruin us!” This is what impressed me most in “The Necklace” written by Guy de Maupassant. I love the story not only due to the incredibly wonderful ending, but also because of the exquisite description of the weakness of humanity.
In his story, Guy de Maupassant creatively reveals Mathilde Loisel's dreams of a wealthy, splendid lifestyle. Mathilde's lifetime of misery and despair is solely caused by her own selfish acts. And her vain obsession all ended up ruining her life.
Vanity is defined as excessive pride, especially in your appearance. In Mathilde's case, the "excessive pride" in her looks and charm caused her to feel as if she deserved a higher ranking social class and the wealth. When she wore the necklace to the party, she wanted to give the illusion that she was something that she was not. Vanity caused Mathilde to fantasize about her life and surroundings-to live in a world of illusion, rather than reality.
Her life was affected in a negative way because of her obsession with vanity. It is so〖〗 sad that she honestly felt successful the night of the dinner, just because of her looks and her surroundings. What a distorted view of true happiness and fulfillment! NEither an elegant dress or a beautiful piece of jewelry can make a person who they are. A caring and loving person has to be unselfish. Mathilde Loisel definitely lacked a caring and loving personality. The only person she proved to love was the person she wanted to be. Had Mathilde not spent so much of her life selfishly, she and Mr. Loisel could have had a lifetime of happiness. The most ironic and interesting piece of the story is the conclusion. Their lives were ruined for no reason. Had she told Mrs. Forrestier the truth about the lost necklace, she would have known that the necklace was just costume jewelry. Actually, it’s a tragedy made by herself, for she was conquered by the evil of her heart.
In pursuit of vanity may lead to the loss of ourselves. Accept who we are and to be to true to ourselves or else it will contribute to� constant unhappiness. Happiness or misfortune, it all depends.